On 01/21/2011 12:10 AM, Matt Ebb wrote: > I say this not to be negative, but because there is a lot of room for > functional improvement in blender's compositor, and if it is to be > re-coded, it should be done with an eye to workflow and future > abilities, not just from a purely techno-centric perspective. I don't see it as negative. Also I don't think that I am (cap)able to implement all these functional wishes/changes. They need to be thinked about by users/developers together. I also don't think it is good to do all this work we discussed in a single project. There will be a separation of technology and functionality. First should concentrate in implementing a kernel (stable ground), that is capable of our 'future' wishes/changes/capabilities. And secondly we need to implement the more functional/workflow part.
The first part needs to know the directions of the second part (vision). This vision should be clear upfront, but not in details. Jeroen _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
