Hi all,

Mike and Joshua, thanks for your answers.

Mike Belanger a écrit :
> Yes the NLA is designed (and very good) at sharing actions.
> raphael,
> 
> Here's a file demonstrating the NLA solving your problem.  Note that I'm not 
> a huge fan of keying on object level, but it is possible.
> 
> http://www.pasteall.org/blend/5543
> 
> On 2011-03-10, at 7:38 PM, Joshua Leung wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> For a moment there I was confused by the terminology you were using.
>> If I understand correctly, you want to have several rigs sharing the
>> same action (pose-bone level animation), but still be able to position
>> the rig objects in different places (object-level animation).
>>
>> There isn't any bug here. By design, a single animation data (1 action
>> + a collection of drivers + a collection of nla-tracks (containing
>> strips referencing actions)) block lives on each ID-block (i.e.
>> Object/Lamp/Material/etc.) Now, PoseBones are data hanging off an
>> Object, just like the Object's transform properties
>> (loc/rot/scale/etc.) Hence, they are affected by the same animation
>> data block.
>>
>> For what you want to accomplish, what you really want to do is to use
>> the NLA system. One strip gets the object-level, another gets the
>> pose-bone level.  See
>> http://aligorith.blogspot.com/2010/10/clarifying-animation-workflow-in.html
>> with regards to NLA usage.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> Joshua
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:13 AM, raphael <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> i was about to make a bug report but i prefer posting here first.
>>> (didn't have any answer in supports forum)
>>>
>>> In blender 2.49, you can have one ipo linked to armature's Object,
>>> one action linked to it's data. So, differents armatures can have
>>> their own position (+rotate and scale), and sharing the same action.
>>>
>>> In 2.5, ipos and bones animations are both included in "actions",
>>> and differents armatures can't share actions and have
>>> different movements on the same time.
>>>
>>> Is it a bug, the result of the new design or something that can be
>>> changed in users prefs ?
>>>
>>> some test files here
>>> http://dwarf.free.fr/blender2.5/armatures_249-01.blend
>>> http://dwarf.free.fr/blender2.5/armatures_250-01.blend
>>>
>>> regards
>>> raphael
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bf-committers mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bf-committers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bf-committers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Bf-committers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers

Reply via email to