Hi, So i did as Harley proposed. here are the new entries ready for approval:
http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:Glossary/Material http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:Glossary/Texture http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:Glossary/Procedural_Texture http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:Glossary/Image_Texture http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:Glossary/Movie_Texture http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:Glossary/Baked_Texture http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Doc:Glossary/UV_Image Note: I proposed "UV Image" as an acronym for "Face Assigned Image". My reason for that: "UV Image" is very descriptive and fits well into the current functionality and is more specific and better to remember than "Face Assigned Image". Please correct me, if my reasoning is wrong or if there is a better alternative (maybe i missed the standard acronym for this) or maybe it is just common sense to use "Face Assigned Image" in this context ? cheers, Gaia On 24.09.2012 17:17, Harley Acheson wrote: > Gaia, > > Personally I would remove empty fillers like "an entity specifying" on > material > and texture. I would also avoid attempts to shorten the definitions and > instead > make them full sentences. So anything in parenthesis should be expanded into > a sentence, most by adding "for example," for example. > > But really, it is a wiki. Just enter your definitions and if anyone wants > to > correct, improve, or expand on them later they can easily do so. > > Harley > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
