But don't allow this assumption to prevent you from applying a scientific process to verify the disproof. There is knowledge in the ability to say that something is verifiability wrong if the hypothesis could be intuitively believed.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Harley Acheson <[email protected]>wrote: > Take almost any image and bisect a broad diagonal stroke somewhere > near the center and the probability is quite high that it will intersect > something > interesting, especially when your definition of interesting is fuzzy. > > But for this game you are allowed to do it four times and then choose the > best one of the four. Don't be surprised when what you select is pleasing > to you. That is because you are aligning the guides to the image instead > of the image to the guides. > > Harley > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
