On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Brecht Van Lommel <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the names associated and unassociated because they don't > describe how you arrived at the color, just the way it is stored.
Agree 110%. It also eliminates the rather erroneous assumption that unassociated and associated alpha are purely as simple as a divide or multiply away. A do-undo sequence on an associated alpha scene referred image with >1.0 values would likely destroy the data without some workarounds. That still leaves our "Color Unpremultiply" order of events term a little... awkward. Needless to say, perhaps you or Sergey could agree upon and set the baseline and then we can work to get the terms consistent throughout the UI. With respect, TJS _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
