Why not (once code is ready of course) allow its embedment under the "commercial services" terms (provided Octane is ready to accept the conditions)?
On 28/08/2013 00:28, Thomas Dinges wrote: > 2 points speak against this: > > 1) Octane is commercial. There would be no benefit for the majority of > Blender users (like>99% I bet) , because they don't have a commercial > Octane license. > The plugin is not just Python code, it's a lot of C++ code which would > also make the binary bigger. > > 2) The Plugin is still in beta and the code (I got a copy from Otoy), > still needs quite some cleanups imo. > > On a side note, we also don't bundle Luxrender, Yafaray... plugins (I > don't know the reasons for that though). > > Am 28.08.2013 00:10, schrieb Sam Vila: >> Hi, looks like Octane Render just published all the source code and the >> necessary stuff for the Blender Foundation to be able to integrate this >> directly into the trunk. Are you aware about that? If so... why not doing >> it? This is a good chance to show that Blender is also able to deal with >> commercial third parties in a much professional relationship. Otoy just did >> his work, looks like now the ball is in the Blender Foundation side. >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
