I might sound harsh but I believe that to ease out this process, at least for the future, it could be time for the committers to actually commit with the author's name (git commit --author=insert_name) and drop the all "patch by someone" nonsense. If the guys taking care of the Linux kernel can do this with 20 times as much contributors as Blender, the Blender guys can do this.
Commit etiquette, simple stuff. Le 14/09/2014 08:00, Campbell Barton a écrit : > I'd be happy to drop the commit count, its not an accurate indication > of contributions anyway, > > However I don't think doing that makes the task any easier. To get > every patch-author we still need some way to map committed patches to > a user name. > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Harley Acheson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> If it isn't possible to get the diff author information back we could >> _consider_ the following: >> >> Correct a *single* commit (only) for each of the 213 missing contributors, >> abandon the >> "commit count" as being inaccurate from now on, and create a new "Credits" >> page listing >> all contributors without commit count but sorted: Ton, Core devs, module >> owners, >> committers, everyone else. >> >> Harley >> _______________________________________________ >> Bf-committers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
