I intend to keep working on a Boolean redesign, for which I just made a design task, https://developer.blender.org/T67744 and added it to the Modeling Module list, https://developer.blender.org/T63731
(Hope that's OK; haven't had a chance to discuss this with other Modeling Module owners yet.) I also will merge the GSoC custom bevel profile code into master and polish it if need be. (Will add a task for that soon too.) And continue with any bug fixes, small enhancements requested by users for Bevel. Longer term, after Boolean, my next intended big project will be to make Bevel and perhaps Inset behave properly when they bump into/flow over existing geometry. I am open to doing other modeling tasks has higher priority than these, if the group here (and especially Modeling Module members) decide on different priority orider. On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 5:08 AM Brecht Van Lommel <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to review and finish various Cycles patches, listed on the > module page here. The ones I've marked as most important are UDIM, > OpenImageDenoise and procedural texture summer of code. I'm quite > confident these could be in 2.81, since they're not that far from > finished. Hopefully we can get more patches done, I should have time > to review but addressing comments and bug fixing would depend on other > developers. > https://developer.blender.org/T66305 > > Further there is design, code review and assistance for other > projects, which I expect to take up easily half my time. > > There are two other things I'd like to help organize, though probably > I would not have time to implement them myself: > * Upgrade our buildbot to run automated tests and make release builds > * Start a project for Blender performance improvements (make tasks, > setup measurements, think of algorithms/designs) > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 8:01 AM Dalai Felinto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear developers, > > > > Which areas would you like to focus on in the next few months? Which > > code improvements, performance, stability, new features in those areas > > would you work on first [1]? > > > > Finally which bigger new features are you confident would make it in > > the 2.81 release, and which are the ones that might happen? These are > > particularly important so we can allocate more time for code review > > early in the release cycle and work together to assess their > > feasibility. > > > > That should empower us to set priorities and keep our ongoing > > development on track. The original goal of a more strict 2-3 month > > release cycle is still on the table, and it is up to us to set dates > > the deliverables. As long as we are working in the right priorities, > > and strive for quality, which specific features land in 2.81 are > > secondary. > > > > I'm away for Siggraph (28-1) so there is no need to rush to reply to > this. > > > > [1] - Please update the module page to reflect this - > > https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Modules / > > https://developer.blender.org/T63725 > > > > Best regards, > > Dalai > > _______________________________________________ > > Bf-committers mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ > Bf-committers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers > _______________________________________________ Bf-committers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
