I never vocalized it, but it was irritating that it was ofent very slow and clunky for me.
On Mar 15, 9:20 pm, toltesi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 15, 9:01 pm, dakarp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As Aldie explained > > here,http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down/browse_thread/thread/93deaecd... > > > We were trying to convert certain features over to a faster database, > > which would have sped up the site for everyone. It worked fine in all > > of our tests in our dev environment, but crashed randomly under the > > load of the full site. Converting back is taking a bit of time, but > > once we are converted back, that should resolve the problems we've > > seen over the past couple of days. > > I'm curious how many people actually complained about the site being > so slow or if this is just because the site owners "like to tinker" in > an never-ending quest for perfection. I'd suggest that perhaps a poll > to see what the user base actually wants from the site might be in > order to help guide these decisions. As long as the sample size was > statistically valid then it might provide some guidance on what people > want, whether it is new features or "uptime". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
