On Jan 3, 5:27 pm, Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > Must have really entertained you to carry the conversation into a > another thread. Because I've got a little bit of time, how could you > argue against JC's fifth point: "Any behavior not expressly permitted > in the rules of a game should > be considered expressly forbidden by those rules."
Is this a rehash of the "should players in a Dominant Species game be allowed to speak" argument that was derailing one of the DS reviews a couple of months ago? -- JDL -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
