My understanding is that, the economical situation of the 'Geek being what it is, the focus has been on stable live servers that are taken down for maintenance once in a while (and it seems to me that it has been a long while since the last time now), instead of having a mirror site, as that would be too costly.
I might be wrong. On Sep 29, 8:09 am, Scott Alden <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:59 AM, 1 Awesome Guy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey BGGers, > > > So I work in web development and am curious if anyone knows why they > > take the entire website offline for maintenance. In my opinion, a > > website the size of BGG should not be taken offline every time they > > need to make changes. They should be able able to work on a mirror > > site then copy the changes over very quickly. Of course, I do not know > > the specifics of their set-up, but I've never seen another website of > > this size do this. > > > Am I just missing something? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "BGG Down" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
