On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:15:48 PM UTC-7, ralpher wrote: > > It's always a contentious subject whether new editions should be given a > new game entry in the database. Most users say no. That doesn't stop the > admins from continuously letting in new editions as new games. Perhaps it > gives BGG bragging rights (70,,000 games!) but I wonder whether it is > taxing the database.
At a small scale (thousands), a database should be able to handle one more. At a large scale (millions, billions), what's one more to the database? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/P64OAzypyBIJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
