My underlying point is that the system matters depending on what you are 
trying to measure.  As a thought experiment, imagine if BGG had been 
running for 500 years, with cumulative rankings for all that time.  Go and 
Chess would be #1 and #2 just because over time, lots of people played them 
and thought they were great.  Maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea, but it 
would make it impossible for a newcomer like (enter your favorite game 
here) to even get on the charts.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG 
Down" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/yeVhBo2yPqEJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.

Reply via email to