FTW. It really is time for a rethink of how the site is managed. One doesn't have to be "entitled" to see that there's something amiss here. Database-backed websites are an off-the self commodity that can easily be customized to just about any structure. Reliable hosting is cheap and widely available. Yet, this site feels like it was cobbled together like some kind of high school coding project. None of this is a *big* deal, or even a major inconvenience. And I'm happy to continue supporting the site for what it does well, when it does it — but let's admit: it's goofily and unprofessionally designed and managed.
On Sunday, January 13, 2013 6:46:08 PM UTC-5, LaToya Johnson wrote: > > > You know what? None of that changes the fact that with the amount of > downtime THIS site has, it's simply being managed poorly and poor choices > are being made by someone. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/GFcMlB6oD4gJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
