The problem right now is with the content of the database, not a hardware failure(a bgg admin posted what the problem is in another thread.) That's why it's stupid for people to say failover DB would be the solution. When there is bad data in a DB, it gets replicated just like good data, so your replica is just as useless as the main DB.
On Sunday, 13 January 2013 22:12:00 UTC-5, ThatSteveGuy wrote: > > Don't you think the failover issue is more likely to be one of hardware? > I don't think the geek is sitting on extra servers to run a failover > database. > > From what I know of Aldie, if he could make this site available with no > downtime he would. I'm sure no one who invests as much time in a website > as he does enjoys having a bunch of armchair quarterbacks jump on this > message board every time there's an issue to explain just how easily it > could be fixed if they were in charge. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/NmnQev3P97kJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
