Well guys I can try to describe pcyhcology/attitude of media and people voting for Congress... In short "Money".. We'll discuss how First lets take Media :
- Simply media houses will show anything that will fetch them advertisements and revenue. - Also these houses have certain obligations to please the rulers ( remember wht happened to Tahelka)...So today all are going gaga about Rahul..Rahul ka jadoo chal gaya n stuff...so wht abt revenues? dey still get good moolah..coz most of us loves watching stories on Rahul( or any celebrity for tht matter) why? may be becoz we still have this inferiority complex and looks Rahul as our Prince ourselves as his subjects (rather slaves). We seems to love them . Even a small joke will make us laugh as if it was out the world kind of stuff...What does he eats who he dates what he wears what movie he sees ... everything sells like hot cakes...Its out of our love and awe we are glued to tv and help media houses milk advertisers. Coming to Why People vote for Congress: Simply 'Money'. People today want money for themsleves and dey name it development.Nothing bad in it as such but when it comes at price of your motherland??? THese people (who vote for congress etc.) just want to stay peacefully and earn money for themselves. THey dont have courage or interest to face the real issues. Only one issue rules money at pseudo peace. Ask these guys wht dey think abt Bangladeshi infiltration? or about uniform civil code? or about money in swiss bank?.. Are these not part of development...NO..not for them.. To add more ask them about Kashmir. They'll say its not a issue for them and will prefer to ignore this issue coz it does not translate to money :). Ask about Arunanchal Pradesh ( if dey knw abt it) .. dey will still ignore this issue ( evn wont ind if China takes over some part of it). All in all it all about money honey. On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:14 PM, moha gandhi <mohad...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hi.... > This is sure to lead to lot more commnets....... > Indian media is always governed by the Ruling party.....Not many might have > observed, but post genral elections 2004, the ppl who in the previous regime > were termed as "XYZ Ji" were termed suddenly the next day as XYZ. > > What could be a more burning example where news which garner lots of > publicity, and sponserships are aired 24*7 but when a soldier dies fighting > in the LOC, it comes as a news in the last few pages, in a tiny negligible > box. > > Another issue which comes to my mind as of now is, > If we always hear people cribbing about the pusedo secularism ,and as > pointed out by Mr. Joshi and Mr. Sanjiv is : "How can Congress Win the > Elections with such a Clean Sweep ?" > > I want maximum of my friends over here to discuss this issue, as only this > can lead us to the answer why people still vote for Congress ?Who are they ? > How is their pcyhcology ?What effects them to vote for Congress, after > seeing a 26/11 happen in the country ? > > Inspite of having the elections round the cornor, the Congress govt of > Andhra Pradesh, dared to step ahead and issue a power cut in the whole of > the state, 1 month before elections, and there is a clean sweep in State > assembly. > > I am a resident of Hyderbad, and today we are not even gettign enough > drinking water on a daily basis.(inspite of staying in a posh locality, one > can imagine what must be the state of affairs in other areas of the city) Is > this what the Congress Govt terms as Empowerment.........????? But may i > Ask Whose Empowerment , except for their own ?? > > How much more generations of youth need to pass out from the country, befor > India becomes a developed country ? Or in other words, how much more remains > to be ruined ?? > > Thanks & Regards, > Moha Gandhi > > > > --- On *Wed, 5/20/09, Sachidanand Joshi <sachidan...@gmail.com>* wrote: > > > From: Sachidanand Joshi <sachidan...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [bm] Young Member of Paliament > To: bharatudaymission@yahoogroups.com > Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 4:23 AM > > > I also agree with you folks... Even media is biased and the victory of > congress is a victory of Indian media ... and this is the time when we need > a fresh and unbiased media to show the truth truthfully ... > Also, the Nehru family has changed the meaning of secularism and truely > speaking I've got an impression than in India anyone who is anti-Hindu is > secular and anyone who is not anti-Hindu(he may or may not be pro-Hindu) is > communal... > > People are not realizing the fact that Congress has ruled and ruined the > country and still there is a favoritism towards them (just because the media > projects them like this). > > Sorry for spamming but I could not stop my self from writing this. > > Thanks, > Sachid > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:43 PM, manu kaushal <manu5...@yahoo. > com<http://us.mc654.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=manu5...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > >> >> >> To add to your thought, Indian media is slave to pseudo secularist. And >> to a larger extent, our people are slave to media. >> Regards, >> MANU >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Sanjiv kaushal <kaushalsanukumar@ >> yahoo.com<http://us.mc654.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=kaushalsanuku...@yahoo.com> >> > >> *To:* bharatudaymission@ yahoogroups. >> com<http://us.mc654.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=bharatudaymiss...@yahoogroups.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, 19 May, 2009 7:58:18 PM >> *Subject:* [bm] Young Member of Paliament >> >> >> >> We are reguraly getting different news from our electronic media about >> young members of parliament. i have many questions but i can not ask from >> media our if any body can please ask >> >> 1. Only close retatives of our Politicians (Son/Daughter) are young but >> about others AMM Childrens in Congress Languange we can say AMM YOUNG >> >> 2. if your parents are powerfull in politics you don'n need any >> qualification to become a minister even you qualify for top post of Prime >> Minister >> >> 3. Why our Politications are not creating chances for AMM YOUNG is >> politicits is a business >> >> 4. if we go in our history we will found that the AMM ADMI of india is >> still slave except some how our living standard is improved up to some >> extent but still we are in slaveness >> >> >> >> *OUR HINDU RAJA HANDOVER AMM ADMI to MUGAL * >> ** >> *MUGAL HANDEDOVER AMM ADMI TO BRITISH* >> ** >> *AND BRITISH HANDED OVER ADMI TO NEHRU * >> *SO AS ON NOW WE ARE SLAVE OF NEHRU FAMILEY * >> >> *Their may lot of reasons for this * >> *BUT ITS TRUE* >> ** >> ** >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India >> Travel Click >> here!<http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_Travel_1/*http://in.travel.yahoo.com/> >> > > > >