On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:

>
> On 11 Nov 2007, at 6:32 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
>>
>>> But I've no idea what has to be changed for the new Omni frameworks.
>>
>> Well, how about if we just leave it for a week as-is, release 1.3.12
>> next week, then move the branch stuff to the trunk?  The longer we  
>> go,
>> the more complicated the merge will be, and it's going to be hard to
>> maintain a branch.
>>
>> --  
>> adam
>
> I think I'm very much confused. It seems the branch has the changed
> frameworks, is that correct? But the source files were not adapted to
> it. I just fixed that.

No, the branch should have its own frameworks.  I made some  
modifications to them for 10.5 compatibility (which is why they're  
different from the trunk).

adam


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop

Reply via email to