On 11 Nov 2007, at 6:49 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > >> >> On 11 Nov 2007, at 6:32 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: >>> >>>> But I've no idea what has to be changed for the new Omni >>>> frameworks. >>> >>> Well, how about if we just leave it for a week as-is, release 1.3.12 >>> next week, then move the branch stuff to the trunk? The longer we >>> go, >>> the more complicated the merge will be, and it's going to be hard to >>> maintain a branch. >>> >>> -- >>> adam >> >> I think I'm very much confused. It seems the branch has the changed >> frameworks, is that correct? But the source files were not adapted to >> it. I just fixed that. > > No, the branch should have its own frameworks. I made some > modifications to them for 10.5 compatibility (which is why they're > different from the trunk). > > adam
I'm even more confused. The new OmniFoundation has an int for the code in _OFError. That's also what I see in the branch. In the old framework it apparently there was a C-string identifier, as that was what was used in the source. Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
