On Dec 29, 2007 11:43 PM, Christiaan Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 29 Dec 2007, at 11:24 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
> > How should smart groups work with linked files/URLs? I killed the
> > ability to enter Bdsk-File-* field names in the UI, but I don't think
> > allowing that is the right way to do it anyhow. Could we have
> > something like "Linked File" and "Linked URL" as fields for the smart
> > groups that searches the path content of each link? The most common
> > case would likely be a test for a non-empty field.
>
> I'm not sure what to do there. It's not a single item. If anything,
> they probably should not be treated as normal fields. That would not
> allow anything like checking for whether an item has a linked file.
> We could perhaps have a special count. Bdsk-* would certainly not
> work, those fields are not even present.
>
> Christiaan
>
>
>
What about having only options
count is
count is not
count larger than
count smaller than
I don't think path/URL substring matching is very useful.
Christiaan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
