On Dec 29, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > > > On Dec 29, 2007 11:43 PM, Christiaan Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 29 Dec 2007, at 11:24 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > > How should smart groups work with linked files/URLs? I killed the > > ability to enter Bdsk-File-* field names in the UI, but I don't > think > > allowing that is the right way to do it anyhow. Could we have > > something like "Linked File" and "Linked URL" as fields for the > smart > > groups that searches the path content of each link? The most common > > case would likely be a test for a non-empty field. > > I'm not sure what to do there. It's not a single item. If anything, > they probably should not be treated as normal fields. That would not > allow anything like checking for whether an item has a linked file. > We could perhaps have a special count. Bdsk-* would certainly not > work, those fields are not even present. > > Christiaan > > > What about having only options > count is > count is not > count larger than > count smaller than
Sounds great to me. > I don't think path/URL substring matching is very useful. I don't either; I thought it might be a cheap way to implement a check for "Any file is not empty." -- adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
