Yes, but what I'm saying is that you should include all this
complication in the text, not implicitly in some over-complex \cite-
with-extra-stuff insertion. Unless I really have no clue about what
you're really trying to say.
Christiaan
On 11 Feb 2008, at 11:39 PM, Conor McDonough wrote:
>>
>
> Believe me, I wish I could make the rules less complicated! The
> entirety of the text I mentioned is all part of a single citation or
> footnote, and as crazy as it sounds, that is a formal rule that
> authors of legal articles in the U.S. must adhere to. If I understand
> the \cite{} field, the method you've outlined below would create two
> citations, which would violate the rule.
>
>
>> No, the \cite just cites a single source. I don't see this is part of
>> the actual citation. The parenthetical information looks more like
>> another citatino to me, something like
>>
>> \cite{Rowley485} (quoting \cite{Rowley483}). ...
>>
>> Why make it more complicated than it is?
>>
>> Christiaan
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Bibdesk-develop mailing list
> Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
