Phew. And I thought humanities require non-standard BibTeX behaviour 
sometimes…

Still, \cite{} takes an optional argument which could be extended. I 
regularly use something like \cite[123]{citekey} to indicate the page 
number in my LaTeX documents, and this could be extended.

But since you are not trying to do something with LaTeX/BibTeX anyway, I 
don't have any ideas.

Conor McDonough wrote:

> Believe me, I wish I could make the rules less complicated!  The  
> entirety of the text I mentioned is all part of a single citation or  
> footnote, and as crazy as it sounds, that is a formal rule that  
> authors of legal articles in the U.S. must adhere to.  

Would that be a "single citation" or a "single footnote" (the latter 
could 'internally' be generated by two \cite{} commands as indicated by 
Christiaan)?

> If I understand  
> the \cite{} field, the method you've outlined below would create two  
> citations, which would violate the rule.

Not necessarily.

>> No, the \cite just cites a single source. I don't see this is part of
>> the actual citation. The parenthetical information looks more like
>> another citatino to me, something like
>>
>> \cite{Rowley485} (quoting \cite{Rowley483}). ...
>>
>> Why make it more complicated than it is?

Never mind if it already is complicated; when following Christiaan's 
concept, all you had to do is add that second reference (Rowley483) to 
your bibliography.

Given that, something like

\footnote{\cite[at~186]{Rowley485} (quoting \cite[F.~Supp.~528, 
534]{Rowley483}). The trial court Judge held that a free, appropriate 
public education meant “that each handicapped child be given an 
opportunity to achieve his full potential commensurate with the 
opportunity provided to other children.” \cite[F.~Supp.~at~534]{Rowley483}.}

would yield exactly the text that you want to have depending on your 
output settings (.bst in BibTeX/LaTeX, or selfdefined in biblatex).

Anyway, that is no solution for anything else than LaTeX/BibTeX. I have 
no clue about what you already hacked together, but assuming something 
like CiteInPages (which I tried), a citation construct like the one 
above would work as well in Pages (without the \footnote{} command, of 
course, you'd have to put the content of \footnote{} in a Pages footnote 
[actually I've never tried CiteInPages in footnotes]).

Stephan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop

Reply via email to