On Apr 14, 2014, at 12:08, Colin A. Smith wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2014, at 11:42, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, you can say that. I already said you can always formulate the terms to
>> mean the exact reverse. Always. And it again illustrates why trying to be
>> clear here actually buys you nothing, but it costs a lot. In the end, the
>> user just has to remember the two terms and which is which, and that needs
>> some mental image to keep that association. I think in this case this may be
>> strictly logically true, but I don't think it's useful.
>
> I think it’s pretty clear that we strongly disagree on whether it’s a good
> idea to use the same syntax (“=“) to express equality/similarity and
> relationships.
Than which character? I explained why : is bad. And I don't see a problem with
=. And another character requires explaining this other syntax in addition to
the tags used, I don't see what this adds.
> We also disagree on whether typing 3-4 additional characters in addition to a
> copy/paste operation is worth it users in terms of the improvement in clarity.
You cannot copy/paste the UID and the prefix at the same time. This is not an
option.
> I believe how useful those 3-4 additional characters are in improving clarity
> strongly hinges on whether one uses “=“, “:”, or some other separator.
I don't see that.
> Ultimately, you provide the most leadership for this project and get to
> decide. I do disagree with the conclusion you come to.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colin
The way I see it, the most important thing is ease of use. Clarity is a distant
secondary, it's only a help in remembering.
Christiaan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop