On Sep 10, 2007, at 15:20, Justin C. Walker wrote: > On Sep 10, 2007, at 13:36 , Adam R. Maxwell wrote: >> On Monday, September 10, 2007, at 01:15PM, "Justin C. Walker" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> - In both cases, the new icon is just sitting on top of the >>> existing one. Dragging that icon will reveal the previous one. >> >> That's not supposed to happen, and it doesn't happen for me. >> There's no layering; this is more like iPhoto than Finder. Are you >> sure that happens? > > Hmmm...Let me rephrase this: it works this way for different icons. > Perhaps I was momentarily confused :-} by the fact that dragging an > icon currently duplicates it. There's no way to tell whether the > behavior I describe actually occurs (at least, without stepping > through code :-}).
Well, if you /really/ want code, perhaps I can oblige :). Dropping an icon next to itself probably explains it, though, since that does happen. I decided to change my bitmap caching scheme instead of fixing that, though, since playing with Quartz is more fun. >>> -------- >>> When LuteFisk is outlawed, >>> Only outlaws will have LuteFisk >>> -------- >> >> Mmmm...lutefisk! > > Seek help. We only get lutefisk once a year (Christmas Eve, to be precise). I think it's great stuff, although my uncle Ole won't touch it. -- Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
