On 9/12/07, Christiaan Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12 Sep 2007, at 6:10 PM, Chris Goedde wrote:
>
> > On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Okay, using a document-relative path certainly makes sense in that
> >> situation.  The question then becomes: should we keep this
> >> behavior, or break it now?  (By break, I mean use home-relative
> >> instead of document-relative paths).  Opinions from the users?
> >> What's easier for people to deal with?  I think Mike may be
> >> responsible for the original implementation, so maybe he has
> >> comments.
> >
> >  From my perspective, home-relative is much better than bib-relative.
> > I store my master bib file where tex wants it, in ~/Library/texmf/
> > bibtex/bib. I certainly don't want my pdfs there, so a bib-relative
> > path would just be walking back up the hierarchy and then down into a
> > folder inside Documents. In that case it makes more sense to me to
> > just start from ~ .
> >
>
> I wouldn't like to use relative paths as home-relatives. If we want
> to support home-relative paths we should save those using tilde. I
> think relative paths should be either document-relative or papers
> folder-relative. So I think the latter would actually be better, as
> it would also solve your problem.
>
> > In looking at the current preferences, I'm a little confused about
> > this discussion. Under "AutoFile Preferences" it seems that I can
> > choose either between a "Papers folder location" or "Use relative
> > path for Local-Url". A couple comments. First, shouldn't these two
> > choices really be radio buttons rather than checkboxes because you
> > only have an either-or choice? (At first, I was confused why the "Use
> > relative path for Local-Url" was greyed out.) Actually, I see that
> > they can both be unchecked, which seems a little strange. In that
> > case, the preview window shows ~/blah.pdf as the location. Isn't that
> > really a subcategory of "Papers folder location"? Do any users
> > actually uncheck both those boxes?
> >
>
> I don't understand this confusion. If it were radio buttons, indeed I
> could understand it, that's why they're not radio buttons. It's not
> either-or. The "use relative path" is additional (you can choose the
> doc location as the current papers folder, and use absolute paths.).
> It's just that we currently do not allow relative paths for auto-file
> when you have a papers folder, as that would not really make sense.
> Note that the preview is nothing more than a preview. It always shows
> the tilde-abbreviated path, not the actual value of the Local-Url field.
>
> > Second, why not just make "Papers folder location" always be relative
> > to ~ (rather than an absolute path) and keep the "Use relative path
> > for Local-Url" relative to the current document? Wouldn't that solve
> > the current problem while keeping backwards compatibility? Obviously,
> > I'm missing something here ...
> >
>
> It's not really relevant whether the papers folder path is relative.
> It's only relevant where we put the files and what path is used in
> the Local-Url field. We do a lot of resolving for the paths, so
> relative or not, the pappers folder is always resolved to a full path
> during the auto-file process.
>
> > Lastly, if I uncheck "Papers folder location", BibDesk forgets the
> > current location, and I have to relocate it when I check the box
> > again. It would be very nice if BibDesk remembered that location even
> > if the button is unchecked.
> >
> > --
> > Chris
> >
>
> Unchecking means setting the papers folder to the empty string. This
> indicates that auto-file should use the document location. There is
> no separate pref for check/uncheck of this button, so there is no way
> to remember it.

For what it's worth, the checkbox for 'Papers folder location' seems a
little confusing to me.
The tooltips are much clearer, and it'd be best if the information in
the tooltip could be made obvious in the control text - that you're
choosing between filing in a single location or relative to the
document.
Perhaps the current 'papers folder location' setting should include a
radio button to choose between 'file papers relative to document' and
'file papers in fixed location':

(*) File papers in fixed location: [________] (Choose…)
( ) File papers relative to each document.



-- 
Michael McCracken
UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to