> > The mappings of MARC are pretty vague and non-unique. For example > field 653 is described as a :uncontrolled index term". Also how they > are used in practice varies widely. So we only map fields that seem > sensible and widely used consistently. Otherwise you get a lot of > wrong and messy bibtex.
I know this has been discussed before, but I still want to bring it up again. Would it mean much work to have specific mappings for each different server? I think this would make the z39.50 search functions even more useable. simon -- Simon Spiegel Steinhaldenstr. 50 8002 Zürich Telephon: ++41 44 451 5334 Mobophon: ++41 76 459 60 39 http://www.simifilm.ch "Was soll aus mir mal werden, wenn ich mal nicht mehr bin?" Robert Gernhardt ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
