On 10/08/07 09:21, "jiho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-October-08 , at 18:03 , Simon Spiegel wrote:
>> IME latex2rtf is way too limited. It doesn't produce anything useful
>> with either jurabib nor biblatex which is a big problem for people in
>> humanities.
There's no point in supporting biblatex until it's a final product, even if
it's possible. Jurabib would be a nightmare to support.
> I also use latex2rtf but simply because there is no real alternative.
> I also found it has many limitations:
> - I have found that it does not respect natbib settings for inline
> citations (at least)
Can you provide a sample?
> - it does not support utf8 coded documents
Use the version from latex2rtf project's svn. It supports utf8, and also
has some graphics sizing improvements.
> - the equations are converted to pictures (in the best cases)
Really? One reason I stick with latex2rtf is because it gives editable
equations, and doesn't convert them to pictures unless you tell it to. YMMV.
--
adam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
