On Oct 9, 2007, at 04:07, jiho wrote: > On 2007-October-08 , at 18:37 , Maxwell, Adam R wrote: >> On 10/08/07 09:21, "jiho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > latex2rtf used to always output (SomeName, > 2000; SomeOtherName, 2004) instead of what was specified in bibpunct. > Anyway, that seems fixed now, which is a good thing.
I think bibpunct support was added in the last year, but there hadn't been a new version for 2-3 years. >>> - the equations are converted to pictures (in the best cases) >> >> Really? One reason I stick with latex2rtf is because it gives >> editable >> equations, and doesn't convert them to pictures unless you tell it >> to. YMMV. > > Current svn apparently converts latex equations to rtf indeed but, > when they get a bit interesting (sums, fractions etc.) I cannot view > them in either TextEdit, Pages or even NeoOffice. While thats not > surprising for TextEdit and Pages, I would expect NeoOffice to be > better. I seems I'll have to install MS Word in the end. Gasp. Word is the only thing that handles equations and figures in RTF correctly IME. > Thanks for pointing the improvements in the latest version. No problem...I occasionally submit patches (hence the svn version's usage of sips to convert pdf->png on OS X), so I like to see it used and tested. -- adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
