On 2008-01-07, at 11:04 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:

>
> On Jan 7, 2008, at 8:35 PM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:
>
>> Actually, it's not about *visual* differentiation (which I can do),
>> but differentiation that can, say, be discerned by an AppleScript  
>> or a
>> Smart Folder. (For the record, 4938 refs, 3119 single files, and  
>> 304 >
>> 1 file).
>
> Thanks, that's a pretty important distinction!  I hacked some trivial
> Finder label support in, but it'll be disabled until after the next
> release (if it ever does make it in) since it has the potential to
> kill performance.  It'll take some work to make it aesthetically
> pleasing, also.
>
> You'd probably have to AppleScript Finder to get/set those labels,
> even if we do display them.  It might be possible to use smart folders
> with Finder labels, but extending them to arbitrary tags would take
> some thought.

I suppose they could be stored in some bdsk-file-1-attrs field...

>> For example, I put together syllabi with an AppleScript that copies
>> references and PDFs to a separate directory for easy distribution.  
>> The
>> AppleScript can't tell the difference between a local file that is  
>> the
>> actual PDF and a local file that is a related PDF. But if I could tag
>> the correct local file (or, much easier, tag the incorrect ones!)  
>> then
>> an AppleScript or a smart folder could do it. My current smart  
>> folders
>> allow me to find articles that don't have PDFs (of the article)
>> easily; the new architecture doesn't.
>
> One suggestion is to reserve the first slot for the "actual" PDF.
> This is a drawback of having everything in one bag, but at least it's
> ordered.

True; a drag-and-drop arrangement interface would work (but wouldn't  
distinguish between an entry that had one PDF that was the article and  
an entry that had one PDF that was a summmary of something...)

> The tagging ideas will probably stay on the back burner for a while.
> I like xattrs and they're fast to read/write, but I'm not sure if it's
> worth the support costs...

Yes, there seem to be a lot of PEBKAC problems involved with Skim's  
use of xattrs (really due to lack of good support for xattrs by Apple).

-AHM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to