On 8 Jan 2008, at 5:35 AM, Alexander H. Montgomery wrote:

> Actually, it's not about *visual* differentiation (which I can do),
> but differentiation that can, say, be discerned by an AppleScript or a
> Smart Folder. (For the record, 4938 refs, 3119 single files, and 304 >
> 1 file).
>
> For example, I put together syllabi with an AppleScript that copies
> references and PDFs to a separate directory for easy distribution. The
> AppleScript can't tell the difference between a local file that is the
> actual PDF and a local file that is a related PDF. But if I could tag
> the correct local file (or, much easier, tag the incorrect ones!) then
> an AppleScript or a smart folder could do it. My current smart folders
> allow me to find articles that don't have PDFs (of the article)
> easily; the new architecture doesn't.
>

I don't think tags for local files can ever be scriptable. Linked  
files in AppleScripts are just file objects (which are nothing but  
URLs).

Christiaan

> Now, I certainly don't think this needs to be in 1.3.13 (I already
> have a workaround for my scripts through script hooks: everything
> added to the local-url field is added automatically as a linked file,
> and vice versa if local-url isn't yet filled in) I'm partially
> thinking out loud about how the current metadata-in-a-file support in
> BibDesk (Skim notes!) could be expanded to include tagging files with
> other metadata. One way to do it would be to use Finder metadata;
> another just to store it in xattrs on each PDF. Of course, that might
> take forever to read in, so it might be easier (faster?) to do it
> within BibDesk instead.
>
> -AHM
>
> On 2008-01-07, at 7:57 PM, Derick Fay wrote:
>
>> Here are my #s:
>> 847 total refs.
>> 1 w 14 files (a complete book)
>> 1 w 13 files (a complete dissertation)
>> 1 w 6 files (a complete book)
>> 1 w 4 files (2 sets reading notes, two articles on the pub.)
>> 3 w 3 files
>> 12 w 2 files (all reading notes and text)
>> 205 w 1 file (a mix of reading notes and texts)
>>
>> and the balance with none (but this is largely because I imported 550
>> or so items from an old Paradox database -- most will have files
>> added eventually; likewise many with one will have two).
>>
>> Or about 2% with >1 file.
>>
>> Looking through the items, I can differentiate each attachment from
>> the preview image, filename &/or file type (sorry Alex :) ) so it's
>> not a serious problem for me.
>>
>>>>>
>>> Alex, do you have a lot of references with multiple attachments, or
>>> is it a small percentage?  I generally work with references that
>>> will have 1 or 2 attachments at most, so I'm interested in hearing
>>> about problems from others.  I'd also like to make sure that it's
>>> a /real/ problem before solving it :).
>>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ----
>> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
>> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
>> just about anything Open Source.
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/ 
>> marketplace
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bibdesk-users mailing list
>> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/ 
> marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> Bibdesk-users mailing list
> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to