On Monday, February 04, 2008, at 02:12PM, "Niels Kobschaetzki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Feb 4, 2008 4:32 PM, Adam R. Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Feb 4, 2008, at 1:43 AM, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: >> >> > just an additional idea - you could set up then two >> > update-possibilities: stable and nightly. That would ease it up for >> > ppl who wanna test a lot of things I think because they do not have to >> > download the nightly on regular basis. >> >> That may require changes to the nightly build system; if so, I'm not >> going to invest any time in making it work, but I'll happily let >> anyone with a Leopard system take over nightly builds. Mike Hohensee >> did nightly builds for a long time, but I didn't want to ask him to >> install Leopard on his PowerBook just for this. > >Why would we be Leopard needed?
Certain functionality in BibDesk requires compilation using Leopard and Xcode 3, so Leopard is required to create the nightly builds. >I just thought that it could be done >via Sparkle. If I understood the framework right it is just an appcast >(in contrast to a podcast) and that you would need only two feeds then >while the user selects in the preferences which he wants. The person >who does the nightly build would just have to update the rss-feed in >addition to the nightly build, wouldn't he/she? I believe you are correct; this appcast updating is what requires changes to the nightly build setup, which is presently an Automator workflow run by iCal. If someone wants to work on it, I'll send you the Automator workflow. I'm not touching it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
