On Jun 22, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Alex Montgomery wrote: > It's the incredibly stupid "JSTOR CITATION LIST" that BibDesk chokes > on. I suppose that the parsing from the clipboard could be changed to > ignore things that make no sense between entries...
I missed this in my earlier reply, but junk between entries is ignored by the parser; technically, you can put any text you like in a BibTeX file, without using @comment or % comments. Sniffing the clipboard text to see which (if any) supported type it contains is difficult to do reliably. It's actually odd that the New Pubs From Clipboard action fails, and the "verbose" flag in -[BibDocument newPublicationsForString:type:verbose:error] appears to be responsible; my comments in that code about partial data predates the verbose option, and are now out of context, so I'm not sure what's going on. Additionally, -[BibDocument importFromPasteboardAction:] checks for a non-nil error, which is not correct. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
