On Jan 3, 2009, at 11:42 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 3 Jan 2009, at 7:01 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:FWIW, I'd suggest that Greg's patch or the original code should probably be used for PubMed, since this sounds like pretty serious breakage for PubMed.-- AdamBut this is in the RIS parser, not the PubMed parser, which completely overrides this change. So why would this be affected? Or does PubMed not even provide PubMed format anymore?
Look at where the code you removed was: http://bibdesk.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bibdesk/trunk/bibdesk/BDSKRISParser.m?r1=12305&r2=13424Unless I'm totally misreading this, it was in the +itemsFromString:error: method, which the PubMed parser does not override. So originally the year was extracted from PubMed dates using the same regex as for RIS, by design as I've said. I really don't think this is PubMed's fault...
-- adam
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
