On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:31 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
Ah, I was looking at another change. I thought this was about a recent change, this is a relatively old change. RIS is truly a mess, that's why the RIS parsers are a mess.
That's a bit unfair, since RIS and MEDLINE actually are well documented, public specifications. The main problems I've seen are due to certain publishing cartels that ignore the specs and dump random stuff in RIS fields.
MEDLINE should be more consistent than RIS, since NIH is the source of the spec and the output. I wish I'd seen this a few years ago:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/mms/medlineelements.html
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
