On Mar 3, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > Have you compared my abbrev or plain templates? I think those can give > a good starting point, because they're based on the standard bibtex > styles. > > Christiaan
Yes, that's how I originally figured out the templates. Since the Preview template provides a compact, formatted representation, it needs to deal adequately with the various complements of fields in all reference types. The current final template <?$pubType?> doesn't handle everything gracefully. For example, there are doubled periods, etc., for some entries because of the need to include lots of fields that might have content. I think I could do better by adding some additional templates for particular reference types and thinking a bit more about the final template. Jim > > > On 3 Mar 2009, at 10:32 PM, James Harrison wrote: > >> Also, if there was any thought of including my preview template in >> BibDesk, I'd want to do a little work on it, perhaps with some help >> from someone who is deeply knowledgeable about templates. It works >> well for me now, but there are couple of lesser-used bibliography >> types that I think could be covered better, and I'm not sure that I >> am >> using conditional punctuation optimally in all cases. If it becomes >> more widely used and anyone has any problems, please feel free to let >> me know (especially if you know how to fix it!) and I'll try to make >> improvements. >> >> Jim Harrison ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
