On Dec 22, 2009, at 23:38, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:

> 
> On Dec 22, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
> 
>> Were you using the French localization by any chance? Then this may happen, 
>> because the French localization is disabled in the nightlies, while the 
>> boolean and 3-value fields are saved as localized strings.
> 
> In retrospect, maybe saving localized values for essentially BibDesk-owned 
> data wasn't the best idea :/.

Indeed. I don't recall what considerations were made, but I think it was done 
before there was a localization.  Perhaps for backward compatibility before we 
had check boxes. It was also based on Omni's methods.
 
This was one of the various problems why I always thought localizations of 
BibDesk aren't really a good idea.

>  It might be best to just store that as an integer in future, and still allow 
> the old values for comparison...providing that could be done safely even when 
> the localization is disabled.

Switching from French to English will never work, because the English version 
will never understand "Oui" and "Non".

Christiaan



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to