I think the Word-focus makes for a poor excuse in this context. A good review should at least give a nod to potential alternatives.
On 05.05.2011, at 17:56, Maxwell, Adam R wrote: > A mildly interesting review of the new Papers version is at > > http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/05/papers-2-your-new-best-os-x-research-management-app.ars > > It still bugs me that BibDesk is totally ignored by the reviewer; I suspect > this is mainly due to his Word-only focus. Some of the comments make this > more clear. > > More interesting is that Papers and Mendeley are both using CSL for > formatting. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software > The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network > management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial > acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd > _______________________________________________ > Bibdesk-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
