On Nov 19, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Simon Spiegel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 19.11.2012, at 12:53, "M. Tamer Özsu" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Could you not put it in the Note field? > > > You could, but it would an ugly solution. As a principle: You can always put > everything your style doesn't handle in 'note', it's just not the best way > because it means that you can't manipulate different kind of data in 'note'. > > Like Jan Jakob, I'd have a look at biblatex; if you're in humanities you > might take a look at my style biblatex-fiwi which makes heavy use of various > orig-fields. For general-purpose work that will ultimately be formatted by the author, I agree, biblatex is the way to go. For special purpose work, such as a manuscript that will eventually be formatted by the styles of a journal, Note seems good enough: it saves the relevant information in the bibtex record, and is typeset correctly, at least by some bst styles (I tried unsrtnat). Themis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
