Hello, I've bigforth 2.1.0 from 6th of February this year. But I don't have a test.fs. Where did you got yours?
The 'magic' 0 I _assume_ is not a bug. It is 'only' a disturbing output from something in test.fs and it is swallowed befor test.fs finishs. So you get .s <0> after test.fs. Only a guess. Regards Martin Am Mittwoch, den 18.05.2005, 18:29 -0400 schrieb Don Venhaus: > > > bigforth test.fs > > > <1> 0 > > > > > > > > > The zero on the stack was not there in 2.0.10 > > > > Hm, strange. I can't reproduce it here. > > even stranger, i get... > > >bigforth test.fs > <1> 0 > ANS bigFORTH 386-Linux rev. 2.1.0 > > .s <0> ok > > --- where did the zero come from, and where did it go? > > Don > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
