Hi Pierre-François, I have bad time understanding what's going on. Could you provide a complete function definition because currently I'm not able to build something similar to the situation that raises the bug.
You mentioned that the dataflow has erroneously removed some code. This is quite possible I will check what's going on as soon as possible but the problem is that in your excerpt I don't see what has been removed. What is missing according to you? I see no difference in between the dataflow and dataflow+. I don't suspect a GC problem. For now, it rather sounds like a mistake in the CFA analysis that incorrectly transforms a plain procedure into an el-procedure. It would really helped if you could send me an actual code (even privately if you have copyright issues). Thanks in advance. -- Manuel
