Hi Steve! I don't think the vote has been *officially* called yet.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Steve Loughran <[email protected]> wrote: > =0. I've heard of problems related to glibc and other RHEL quirks > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7156 Looks like this one should be now fixed upstream: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0560.html Thanks for the pointer, though. I've started a wiki page to record this type of information: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/List+of+known+issues+on+various+platforms Hopefully it will not grow too long ;-) > The alternative would be the 5.7+ branches, which are what people tend to > run in production >> * Latest released Fedora (currently 15) > > I'm a -1 on this because it's too bleeding edge, it's not LTS, and you will > end up debugging fedora problems. On both of these point: personally, I'd love Bigtop to take a page out of Ubuntu's book and have a ratio of LTS-type releases (where we support old and stable) to ongoing type releases (where we support new and sometimes bleeding-edge at the time) being 1:4 or something like that. Thanks, Roman.
