On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:41PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: > On 09/09/2011 09:28 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Sorry if I am missing something, but why exactly a re-vote would be needed? > > Any references to bylaws dictating it? ;) > > > > Cos > > > > That was a question, not an affirmation :) > People have voted on something which is different than what Andrew want > to propose. So I am not sure their votes would still apply. Or does that > mean we can start a vote, have some people voting and then change the > terms of the vote and still apply the votes for the previous proposal? > > The vote is now closed and I am about to count votes. So any additional > information is welcome.
I see. If it is closed then it closed. Changes are suppose to be revoted, I guess.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
