So you are suggesting expanding the charter to include projects not hosted at Apache?
This is a new precedent and seems like it merits discussion. On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:50 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: > I am not sure to follow. > The charter hasn't changed at all. Hue is Apache licensed and related > to Apache Hadoop. So I don't see any issue. > It is not different from Apache Hadoop depending on other projects not > being part of the Apache Foundation. These are just build dependencies. > > Restricting ourselves to Apache Foundation projects only would really > limit the opportunities of Apache Bigtop. The same way if Apache Hadoop > could only depend on dependencies being part of the Apache Foundation. > > > > On 04/30/2012 03:30 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler wrote: >> A question... >> >> The stated goal of BigTop is to package "official releases of the Apache >> Hadoop-related projects". I believe stated policy is to require that only >> official releases from Apache projects can be packaged, no patches or >> development branches. Do I have that right? Has Cloudera contributed Hue >> to Apache or are you suggesting a change to the charter of BigTop to package >> vendor hosted projects as well as Apache Projects? >> >> Thanks, >> >> E14 >> >> PS - Just looked up the incubating proposal: >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cbanlktimriyvs5g5maklqvinauz9h6s5...@mail.gmail.com%3E >> >>> Build, packaging and integration test code that depends upon official >>> releases of the Apache Hadoop-related projects (HDFS, MapReduce, >>> HBase, Hive, Pig, ZooKeeper, etc...) will be developed and released by >>> this project. As bugs and other issues are found we expect these to be >>> fixed upstream. >> >
