On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > I am coming from Hadoop's land where a normal practice is to accompany any > commit with an appropriate record in the CHANGES.txt. It seems to be much > easier not to miss anything this way around, doesn't it?
Understood. Personally, I'm a big fan of autogenerating CHANGES.txt from the Git/SVN history. Not sure what others think. Thanks, Roman.
