On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:13PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > > I am coming from Hadoop's land where a normal practice is to accompany any > > commit with an appropriate record in the CHANGES.txt. It seems to be much > > easier not to miss anything this way around, doesn't it? > > Understood. Personally, I'm a big fan of autogenerating CHANGES.txt > from the Git/SVN history. Not sure what others think.
Me too. So, if we have a process (as in a script:) in place for that then I am totally fine and will in fact go ahead and remove two jiras from 0.5 section. Sorry for the confusion - I musta been sleeping behind the wheel. Cos > > Thanks, > Roman.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature