On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:13PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I am coming from Hadoop's land where a normal practice is to accompany any
> > commit with an appropriate record in the CHANGES.txt. It seems to be much
> > easier not to miss anything this way around, doesn't it?
> 
> Understood. Personally, I'm a big fan of autogenerating CHANGES.txt
> from the Git/SVN history. Not sure what others think.

Me too. So, if we have a process (as in a script:) in place for that then I am
totally fine and will in fact go ahead and remove two jiras from 0.5 section.

Sorry for the confusion - I musta been sleeping behind the wheel.
  Cos

> 
> Thanks,
> Roman.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to