*  *

* Jharkhand  <http://jharkhand.org.in/blog> Blog <http://jharkhand.org.in/blog>
*

** *  *  <http://www.jharkhand.org.in/forum>

**
**

**





 <http://jharkhand.org.in/blog>

<http://worldsikhnews.com/25%20June%202008/Government%20of%20India%20Guilty%20as%20charged.htm>

   ** <http://www.jharkhand.org.in/contact.htm>
 <http://www.jharkhand.org.in/members>



  * Unmet demand for contraception is the highest in Bihar, Jharkhand and UP
*

The unmet demand for contraception is the highest in Bihar, Jharkhand and
UP. Together with Madhya Pradesh, these States produce the maximum
underweight, stunted and wasted children born to under-aged mothers



Were it not for the Hindi-belt States, India might well have been another
country. Girl's married before the legal age, high fecundity of adolescents,
recurring childbirths and absence of birth spacing make tedious reading. But
when the findings of the National Health Survey-3 are read alongside the
Ministry of Human Resource and Development and National Population
Commission data, a few surprises and some shocks emerge.



First, Orissa has crawled out of the BIMARU (now EAG) stranglehold. It has
among the lowest annual growth rates (2001-2010) projected for the country
-- just a shade higher than Kerala and Tamil Nadu. As far as the age of
marriage and adolescent fertility are concerned, Orissa is lower than
Gujarat and Haryana. Female drop-out rates from classes' I-X are better than
the All-India average and far better than neighbours Assam and West Bengal.
High infant mortality, however, pulls back other achievements.



Let's move over to Himachal Pradesh. The female dropout rate from class I-X
stands only slightly above Kerala. HP also has the lowest percentage of
women married before 18 -- far ahead of Kerala, Tamil Nadu or any other
State. As a natural outcome the percentage of women that started
childbearing before 19 was just 3 per cent compared with 27 per cent in
Jharkhand and 25 per cent in Bihar and West Bengal. No wonder that the
fertility rate of Himachal Pradesh is equal to that of Kerala. This also
blasts the belief that only the Southern States have the commitment to
propel population stabilisation.



Another shock is how poorly West Bengal performs when it comes to the age at
which girls start childbearing. The State is at the level of Bihar on this
index with 62 per cent of girls married before 18, belying lofty claims that
women's welfare has pervaded the proletariat. In terms of educational
attainment, the class I-X female dropout rates are worse than even Madhya
Pradesh.



When it comes to the use of contraceptives, Andhra Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh
and Punjab come out the best. Predictably the unmet demand for contraception
is the highest in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Jharkhand, with the gaps in
contraceptive cover resulting in high fertility and appalling levels of
maternal, infant and child mortality. Together with Madhya Pradesh these
States also produce the maximum underweight, stunted and wasted children in
India.



Ultimately, faster development cannot take place unless fertility rates come
down much sooner. Much as education, electrification, safe drinking water
and toilets are necessary, absence of these can hardly be an alibi for
denying reproductive rights, now. Pushing up the age of marriage as
exemplified by Himachal Pradesh is a single achievable goal which can make
the biggest difference. If we could simply ensure that girls do not get
married before the legal age of marriage, up to 3.4 million births each year
could be averted. That is 12 per cent of the total annual births in the
country. Is it too much to ask Governments to ensure that marriages are
stopped before the legal age? The road to population stabilisation need not
be preceded by citing the education first approach all the time. Important
as education is, Himachal Pradesh and Orissa have shown that other things
too can make a difference to fertility and population growth.



The new Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006 was notified on 10th January
2007. With its enactment, the Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929 was
repealed. Legally and administratively no law exists today to restrain or
stop child marriages in States that have failed to notify the rules that
accompany the Act. In effect no cognisance can be taken of those who marry
off their daughters before 18.



According to information available with the Ministry of Women and Child
Development, only Rajasthan, Karnataka, Kerala and Manipur have enacted the
rules which are necessary for enforcing the Act. This despite a lapse of
nearly 20 months and repeated exhortations to speed up the process. Chief
Ministers need to be confronted with their perfunctory attitude to an all
important subject which directly affects the health and well-being of
mothers and children.



Laws apart, when did the Chief Ministers of Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Madhya
Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Chattisgargh, and West Bengal last review early
marriages or order an audit into high levels of maternal mortality? What
directions did they give? With what result?



None that is apparent from any published work.



Laws alone will not change the face of India. But in the absence of law and
with more than 65 per cent of the girls in several States being married
before 18 it is shocking that Chief Ministers can ignore what is happening.



A year ago on the World Population Day, 500 adolescents were brought to
Delhi to be sensitised about population issues. It was a sad commentary on
the prevailing situation when they stepped on the stage to castigate their
Chief Ministers for incentivising more and more deliveries by offering saris
and other goodies to reward every birth. If only Chief Ministers cared to
listen to what the youth of this country seeks, election manifestos may
start caring about fulfilling population goals and reproductive rights.





http://jharkhandnews.blogspot.com/2008/08/unmet-demand-for-contraception-is.html









  *988*

   -
      - Jharkhand Forum <http://www.jharkhand.org.in/forum>
   - Directory
      - Jharkhand Directory <http://www.jharkhand.org.in/directory>
   - Jharkhand
      - Jharkhand (USA) <http://www.jharkhand.us/>
      - Jharkhand Forum <http://www.jharkhand.org.in/forum>
      - Jharkhand Live <http://www.jharkhand.org.in/live>
      - Jharkhand.org.in <http://www.jharkhand.org.in/>
      - Jharkhand.org.uk <http://www.jharkhand.org.uk/>

Reply via email to