I'm reminded of the time, a coupla years ago, when there was much hue and cry about the graffiti on the Southwest Path, near Allied Drive, and the effort made to remove it, when all the while the path, and many others, had woefully fading center stripes.
(I'm waiting for someone with a red spray can to correct the grammar on the latest work in question, complete with proofreading marks.) > From: Martin Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'd love to hear some thoughts on how "graffiti" > "creates a bad image". Feel free to send them to me > directly so as not to flood the list with off-topic > subject matter. > > I consider things such as bike paths to be public > property and feel that public property may be used by > the general public in anyway that is not physically > destructive or in such a way as to hinder it's > intended use. In my opinion graffiti on any bicycle > path does not destroy or alter the paths > functionality. > > If someone set out at night and used paint to create > an image upon the bike path which you as an individual > found astheticly pleasing, let's call it "art", would > you take issue? > > Lurking from DC, > > Martin --------------- Paul T. O'Leary Desktop Insurgent Madison, WI USA _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
