Scott,
Thanks for your e-mail. It sounds like you agree that it is unrealistic
to turn back the clock. Presumably, Pam would also agree. But what
does that leave Pam to do?
How willing is she to stand behind Jack Hirt and, now, Dan Vogt to pull
the Bike Fed forward?
How likely will it be for her to spend most of her effort rehashing the
past? How would this exercise not be divisive at a time when the Bike
Fed needs a board focusing on the future, not the past.
I would not expect Pam to propose reversing the staff, but it would
hardly surprise me that should would be waging a campaign to question
the board's leadership for what she believes are wrongs and to exact
justice for these ills.
I can see only benefits to the enemies of our cause through any such effort.
Thanks,
Richard
Scott Rose wrote:
You make a pretty strong set of arguments, but at one point you stoop
to what seem to me to be intellectual dishonesty: you imply that Pam
would support firing the current ED and rehiring the old one. She
hasn't said that, and such a position doesn't follow from what she has
said. That weakens the credibility of the rest of your arguments. And
you drop a lot of names, which seems gratuitous. And you've come to
bikies to post for what I think is the first time to push this
particular agenda. I don't think you'll be too successful with this
audience.
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
