Re: [Bikies] why my candidate is best for our desires!

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:00:36 -0700

Dear "Troll Feeder", Michell Nussbaum,

A basic question might be, "Select the item which does not fit with the other items."----1. Bike paths, 2. Interstate Highway System, 3. Hub Airports, 4. Hub Airports Air Traffic Controllers.    But even more directly, ----as of YET, bike paths are not determined and controlled from Washington.  As you might expect, I would lead a charge to "privatize" the three Federal monopolies you describe if I had the following to do so.

Eric

Mitchell Nussbaum wrote: 
Why are "bike paths controlled and paid by the Federal government in
Washington" while Interstate highways, and airports and air traffic
controllers, which are also paid for and controlled by the Feds, are not
worth mentioning?

P.S. to the group: please forgive me for feeding the troll.  I couldn't
help myself.

Eric Westhagen wrote:
  
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Dear TroyThiel,
<p>I hope you "jest" as THIS being the clincher for a presidential vote
determination or even "swing" as you imply.&nbsp; Even in this "highly
political" listserv ostensibly for biking, some might dislike "bike paths
controlled and paid by the Federal government in Washington" at the behest
    

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies


  

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to