At 8:47 PM -0700 9/21/08, Eric Sundquist wrote:
The same article was in the A section of the WSJ this morning.

See, it isn't just the cartoon news that picks it up!


Tim Gruber has been working to reduce parking minimums through the zoning rewrite. I don't know how much progress he's made.

Apparently not much. Here is what the "Annotate Outline" (http://www.cityofmadison.com/neighborhoods/zoningRewrite/documents/ZRAnnotatedOutline.pdf) has to say:

Off -street parking and loading. This fairly lengthy section could
constitute its own subchapter or be included in this subchapter. It will
include:
Revised standards for automobile parking, including standards
for "spec" uses and standards based on square footage rather than
number of employees. The standard list of uses allowed within
zoning districts will be used for parking requirements as well.
Revised bicycle parking schedule
Standards for moped parking
Parking design and maintenance standards, including pervious
parking standards
Standards for shared parking and for parking reduction or
reservation of future parking
Revised standards for loading facilities to exempt smaller buildings

That is a whole heck of a lot of jargon with a heckuva lotta wiggle room for upward revisions in parking requirements on the part of the city or desired parking by developers themselves. We need to see that language boiled down to this: All current minimum parking standards will now be maximums; furthermore, there are no longer minimums.


I tried to schedule a small group meeting with the consultants on this when they were here a week ago, but the times were all taken, and staff is supposed to set something up in October.

See what you can do to set a new standard of "extreme." They are playing that "balancing" game that mealy mouthed community planners love to do, playing one group off against another to come up with a muddled & meaningless standard.


One complication, which shouldn't be a big deal but that requires some thought, is that bike parking and I believe ADA parking are tied to the current car minimums.

Easy, just reference the old, (i.e., current standard) ratios and maintain those.

One thing that needs to be changed is this: Currently the zoning code says (something to the effect) that bike parking must be equal in convenience to the average car parking space in the lot (help me out here, Arthur!). In theory that is to prevent bike parking from getting put out by the dumpster. But this should be boldly changed. Bike parking should be *the* most conveniently located (non-handicap) parking space there is. Period. Full stop.

This was one of the fights that I actually was able to win pretty frequently on the Urban Design Comm. Most developers were pretty happy to accommodate bikes in convenient places. Most of them simply didn't think about bike parking, but once it was brought to their attention, they pretty willingly brought bike parking up much closer to the doors. That is to say, my proposal for the zoning code to make bike parking the most convenient spots in the lot would not be in the least bit onerous.



Bigger problem of course is that staff and alders already get a lot of complaints about street parking.

They need to tell their constituents: Welcome to the big city. Welcome to a place that puts a premium on its greenspace, its water supply, its reduced urban heat island effect, its aesthetics, its walkability, its civilized scale. People over here in the 6th--not exactly a parking nirvana--were adamantly against big parking lots at the zoning meeting. Separately, Coleman (lurking somewhere around here!) was the driving (so to speak!) force behind keeping parking levels low in new developments along Willy St. Der Wongendörfer & I have tag teamed on the same topic--with some success, I might add--wrt to new development out along Atwood Ave.

Shoup has a solution for all of that, but it's a challenge to get it heard.

I think we need to get Shoup here in Madison for a talk. His ideas have the potential to completely and thoroughly rewrite history in terms of urban vitality. http://shoup.bol.ucla.edu/



But if we can reform parking it will be a game changer.

I think it's going to be a challenge with these middlin' planners.

-Mike
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to